Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Obama Offers Flexibility to Implement Single Payer Faster

If you're having trouble viewing this message, please view it online.

Obama Offers Flexibility to Implement Single Payer Faster

Obamacare remains tremendously unpopular with the American people. According to the latest Kaiser Family Foundation poll, only 14 percent of Americans believe they have benefited from the law, compared to 17 percent who say the law has already harmed them. Only 28 percent of Americans believe Obamacare will help the nation's economy, compared to 45 percent who believe it will make it worse. Overall, 48 percent of Americans oppose Obamacare while only 43 percent favor it. Some provisions, like the individual mandate, are particularly unpopular, with a full 67 percent of Americans favoring its repeal.

President Barack Obama knows all of this, which is why he told the visiting National Governors Association at the White House yesterday that he supports changing the date that states can begin applying for waivers from some Obamacare mandates from 2017 up to 2014. Specifically, the President endorsed legislation by Senators Ron Wyden (D–OR) and Scott Brown (R–MA), claiming: "It will give you flexibility more quickly while still guaranteeing the American people reform." President Obama is at least half right here. Wyden–Brown would give states some flexibility—but only the flexibility to implement a government take over of health care faster. Heritage Foundation Center for Policy Innovation Director Stuart Butler explained in the New England Journal of Medicine:
One [problem] is that [Wyden-Brown] still locks the states into guaranteeing a generous and costly level of benefits. True, a state could propose alternative benefit requirements if they had the same actuarial value as those in the [health care bill]. But the requirements go well beyond basic coverage, and the HHS secretary is the one who defines "at least as comprehensive" benefits. ...

Another major problem with the bill is that since ultimate waiver authority rests with the HHS secretary, the waivers granted would probably reflect the administration's preferences. Senator Wyden claims that his legislation would allow conservative states to opt out of much of the [bill] and implement consumer-driven coverage. But he admits that the secretary, not the state, has the final word over what is permitted.

In essence Wyden–Brown is simply a vehicle for giving deep-blue progressive states the power to institute a single-payer government takeover of health care faster. Politico even confirmed this later in the day when it reported on a White House conference call with liberal allies:
Health care advisers Nancy-Ann DeParle and Stephanie Cutter stressed on the off-record call that the rule change would allow states to implement single-payer health care plans—as Vermont seeks to—and true government-run plans, like Connecticut's Sustinet.

The source on the call summarizes the officials' point—which is not one the Administration has sought to make publicly—as casting the new "flexibility" language as an opportunity to try more progressive, not less expansive, approaches on the state level.

"They are trying to split the baby here: on one hand tell supporters this is good for their pet issues, versus a message for the general public that the [President] is responding to what he is hearing and that he is being sensible," the source emails.

That is exactly what is going on here. The President knows his signature accomplishment, Obamacare, is fundamentally unpopular with the American people. So he is trying to appear "flexible" on the issue, while in reality all he is doing is enabling his progressive allies to expand the reach of government even faster. Conservatives cannot let the President get away with this deception. This episode only proves once again that there is only one path to real health care reform, and it begins with the full repeal of Obamacare.

Print | Comments | Forward


Estonia's Love Affair with Ronald Reagan

The Case for Entitlement Reform: Taxpayer Contributions Fall Dangerously Short of Received Benefits

Raymond Davis Tension Perfect Time to Ramp up Pakistan Civil Society Dialogue

North Korea Outbreak Offers Opportunity for U.S.-China Cooperation

Obama's Phony Obamacare Flexibility Offer


In The Wall Street Journal, Charles Koch explains why Koch Industries is speaking out.

According to Senator Tom Coburn (R–OK), the Government Accountability Office will release a report today showing that overlapping and duplicative programs cost taxpayers between $100 billion and $200 billion a year.

Governor Scott Walker (R) gave absent Democratic lawmakers 24 hours to return to Wisconsin to debate his budget before he would start cutting $1 billion from local governments and responded to criticism from the White House.

According to USA Today, Wisconsin is one of 41 states where public employees earn higher average pay and benefits than private workers in the same state.

Thanks to the city's low-flush toilet mandates, San Francisco stinks.

Share Today's Morning Bell
Facebook Facebook Myspace Myspace
Digg Icon Digg Linkdin Linkdin
Twitter Twitter  


Know anyone who shares your conservative values and principles and may want to receive the Heritage Foundation newsletters?  Please refer them to Heritage today!

Connect with Heritage

facebook Facebook twitter Twitter youtube YouTube youtube Kindle youtube Flickr

Support our work by becoming a member.  Donate today.
The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002-4999
Call us at (202) 546-4400

Add morningbell@heritage.org to your address book
to ensure that you receive emails from us.

You are subscribed to this newsletter as tlm@k3bg.com.

If you want to receive other Heritage Foundation newsletters or opt out of this newsletter please click here to update your subscription preferences.

No comments:

Post a Comment