Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Failure is Obama's Strategy

If you're having trouble viewing this message, please view it online.

Failure is Obama's Strategy

On March 2, President Barack Obama anointed Vice President Joe Biden as his lead negotiator on coming to an agreement with congressional conservatives on this year's federal budget. Biden then spent half a day on Capitol Hill talking with Republicans before jetting off to Europe. The next week, Senator Joe Manchin (D–WV) attacked the President on the Senate floor: "Why are we doing all this when the most powerful person in these negotiations—our president—has failed to lead this debate or offer a serious proposal for spending and cuts that he would be willing to fight for?" What Manchin doesn't seem to realize is that failure is Obama's plan.

After an unprecedented two-year spending spree, President Obama is not looking to change Washington's bad habits anytime soon. However conservatives got the message in last November's elections. The American people want them to take substantive steps towards scaling back an out-of-control government. House Republicans passed a seven-month continuing resolution to keep the government operating that cut $61 billion in spending and blocked funding for a host of terrible policies, including Obamacare. This was a good first step. A modest step Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and President Obama are unwilling to take. In response, Reid and Obama have offered only the status quo.

The White House strategy is clear as day: It knows the American people do not currently trust President Obama on federal spending. Not only do 62 percent of Americans currently disapprove of President Obama's handling of the federal budget deficit, but for the first time in recent memory, more Americans say they prefer the approach of Republicans in Congress (47 percent) on "cutting programs to reduce the budget deficit and still maintaining needed federal programs" than President Obama's (43 percent) approach. The White House knows it has to improve these numbers before President Obama can negotiate short- and long-term spending deals that protect his big-government spending priorities. So how is the White House planning to change these numbers? Two words: government shutdown.

The plan goes like this: President Obama does nothing now and allows the existing continuing resolution to expire. The White House and its media allies then portray the resulting government shutdown as the end of Western civilization as we know it (remember the TARP debate!). Americans' faith in the Republican approach on "cutting programs to reduce the budget deficit and still maintaining needed federal programs" tanks. President Obama then emerges as the centrist peacemaker balancing the spendthrift congressional Democrats with the mean-spirited congressional Republican spending-cutters. President Obama's base then pretends they're offended at some very minor cuts, centrist Republicans cut a deal, and the President's popularity soars like it did after the December tax legislation. Conservatives then go into the deficit ceiling and 2012 budget debates as untrusted losers. That is the White House plan.

Conservatives can't allow this to happen. They should fill the void that President Obama's failure to lead has created. After all, this debate is occurring because the previous Congress failed to even try and pass a budget, one of their basic responsibilities. They must make sure their constituents understand that President Obama and Senator Reid are not acting in good faith. The time for more continuing resolutions is over. This is about much more than cutting $61 billion from this year's budget. If we cannot trim a meager 2 percent now, what hope do we have of tackling entitlements? We must make the tough decisions now because we know President Obama won't.

Print | Comments | Forward


VIDEO: IHOP Owner Fears Obamacare's Impact on Jobs and Economy

In The Green Room: Scott Rasmussen on Obamacare's Unpopularity

Ousting the U.S. Ambassador Does Not Help U.S.–Mexican Crime Fight

Happy Birthday, Obamacare? What It Really Means for American Businesses

Energy Secretary Chu Embraces High Gas Prices, Again


The Obama coalition is showing signs of strain as the U.S., Europe, and Arab nations fight over who will take charge of operations in Libya after the U.S. gives up control.

While congressional Republicans have managed to cut spending by more than $285 million per day since the beginning of March, President Obama's war in Libya is spending well over $100 million a day on missiles alone.

Fact: President Bush had two times more coalition partners in Iraq than Obama has in Libya.

More Americans see Obamacare making things "worse" (44 percent) than see it making things "better" (39 percent).

A San Francisco superior court judge has put California's global warming plan on hold, saying the state did not adequately evaluate alternatives to its cap-and-trade/energy tax program.

Share Today's Morning Bell
Facebook Facebook Myspace Myspace
Digg Icon Digg Linkdin Linkdin
Twitter Twitter  


Know anyone who shares your conservative values and principles and may want to receive the Heritage Foundation newsletters?  Please refer them to Heritage today!

Connect with Heritage

facebook Facebook twitter Twitter youtube YouTube youtube Kindle youtube Flickr

Support our work by becoming a member.  Donate today.
The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002-4999
Call us at (202) 546-4400

Add morningbell@heritage.org to your address book
to ensure that you receive emails from us.

You are subscribed to this newsletter as tlm@k3bg.com.

If you want to receive other Heritage Foundation newsletters or opt out of this newsletter please click here to update your subscription preferences.

No comments:

Post a Comment